-
The National Assembly has ruled out any immediate review of the Electoral Act 2026, insisting that the law has already been passed, assented to and put into operation for the 2027 electoral cycle.
-
Senate spokesman Yemi Adaramodu said reopening the law while parties are already selecting candidates would amount to “shifting the goalposts in the middle of the game”.
-
The Senate’s position follows the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to restore Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2), overturning the Court of Appeal’s earlier declaration that the provisions were unconstitutional.
-
The ruling has renewed debate over party membership registers, waivers and nomination procedures, but several parties, including the PDP, APM, Labour Party and Nigeria Democratic Congress, maintain that their candidates remain validly nominated.
October 05, (THEWILL) – The Senate has shut the door on any immediate amendment of the Electoral Act 2026, insisting that the legislation will remain the legal framework for the 2027 general elections despite the fresh legal and political questions triggered by a recent Supreme Court judgement.
The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Yemi Adaramodu, said the National Assembly would not revisit the electoral law in the middle of preparations for the elections, arguing that doing so could disrupt a process already underway.
Adaramodu said the electoral reform process had been completed specifically to govern the 2027 elections and that any consideration of amendments would have to wait until after the poll.
“We have already done the electoral reform and passed that one. It is meant for the 2027 elections. It is only after it that we can consider it for a review if there is any necessity or calls for amendments and rejigging. That’s when it can come up”, he said.
The senator said the Electoral Act had already passed through the legislative process, received presidential assent and was currently being implemented by political parties and electoral authorities.
“Anybody who has any petition against it should submit to the Senate. But for us at the Senate and National Assembly, we have passed the Electoral Act into law. It has been assented to, and it is now in use”, he added.
Adaramodu argued that changing the law at this stage would create uncertainty for parties that had already commenced processes leading to the nomination of candidates for the 2027 elections.
“As you know, it is through the Electoral Act that parties produced the candidates who will contest in January and February. So, are you now going to shift the goalposts in the middle of the game?How do you halt an Electoral Act that is already in use for a new one? We are not going to do that”, he declared.
READ ALSO:
Supreme Court Reopens Electoral Dispute
The Senate’s position comes days after the Supreme Court restored key provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 that had been struck down by the Court of Appeal.
In a unanimous judgement delivered by a seven-member panel, the apex court set aside the Court of Appeal’s decision and held that Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) were not inconsistent with the Constitution.
The Court of Appeal had in July declared Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) unconstitutional, creating uncertainty over their application to political parties preparing for the 2027 elections.
Sections 77(5), 77(6) and 77(7) concern political party membership registers and participation in party primaries, while Section 84(2) provides for direct primaries or consensus as methods through which political parties may nominate candidates.
The Supreme Court’s decision effectively restored the provisions and removed the legal uncertainty created by the Court of Appeal judgment, which had declared the sections unconstitutional.
The case had reached the apex court after the Independent National Electoral Commission challenged the appellate Court’s ruling.
Candidate Eligibility Under Scrutiny
Although the Supreme Court has settled the constitutional dispute over the provisions, the judgement has generated fresh questions about its possible implications for candidates whose party membership, waivers or nomination processes could be challenged.
Some political parties and candidates, however, have rejected suggestions that the judgement automatically invalidates existing candidacies.
The Peoples Democratic Party, Allied People’s Movement and Labour Party have maintained that their candidates remain eligible, despite concerns surrounding the restored provisions.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress has also dismissed suggestions that the judgement could affect the candidacies of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, his running mate, Rabiu Kwankwaso, and former Deputy Senate President, Ovie Omo-Agege.
The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, had said the Supreme Court decision should not be subjected to individual interpretations, stressing that anyone challenging the eligibility of a candidate should approach the courts.
Felix Ifijeh is a journalist with years of professional reporting experience. Known for his keen news sense, compelling storytelling and commitment to accurate, impactful reporting, he has built a reputation for turning leads into clear, engaging, and well-structured reports that resonate with readers. His work reflects deep newsroom experience and a commitment to accurate, impactful journalism.
