$11bn Arbitration: Bribery Allegations Motivated To Discredit Gas Supply Contract – P&ID Tells Court

January 25, (THEWILL) – The Process & Industrial Development Ltd. (P&ID) has accused Nigeria of a fictitious corruption claim against the $11bn arbitration award to discredit the gas supply contract it entered with the country. The Nigerian government had accused P&ID of bribing government officials in Nigeria, to win a 20-year gas supply contract in […]

Latest News

January 25, (THEWILL) – The Process & Industrial Development Ltd. (P&ID) has accused Nigeria of a fictitious corruption claim against the $11bn arbitration award to discredit the gas supply contract it entered with the country.

The Nigerian government had accused P&ID of bribing government officials in Nigeria, to win a 20-year gas supply contract in 2010.

Nigeria’s legal team argued that When the contract failed, P&ID started an arbitration case and bribed officials working for President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration and colluded to win a $6.6bn arbitration award for lost profits in January 2017.

- Advertisement -

The interest on the $6.6bn awarded has risen by $4.4bn making the amount swell to $11.1bn.

Mark Howard, a lawyer for Nigeria, said in court, “There are many documents that are as close to a smoking gun as one will ever see in a fraud case.”

Howard argued there are multiple payments by P&ID that were allegedly bribes coded as “dash” and “Dublin expenses”.

- Advertisement -Ask ZiVA 728x90 Ads

He also said there is evidence of chats asking parties involved in the deal to delete and burn evidence

But in a counterclaim against the allegation, P&ID lawyer, David Wolfson, in a filing for the trial, described Nigeria’s bribery allegation as a fictitious claim motivated to discredit the gas supply contract it entered into with Nigeria.

The firm argued that Nigeria is a society “where the rule of law is patchy” and alleged that the Federal Government imprisoned people, who have relationships with P&ID.

“The villain of this case is not my client. Instead, it is the all too familiar story of institutional incompetence and buck-passing,” Wolfson said in court.