Oil theft is a global problem with severe consequences for countries worldwide. It involves the unauthorised extraction, transportation and sale of petroleum products and is carried out by organised criminal networks, corrupt officials, military personnel and militant groups. This illicit industry results in significant economic losses, environmental damage, security concerns, and disruptions in the international energy market.
This illegal practice undermines national economies by depriving governments of substantial revenues. It disrupts global energy markets by introducing stolen oil into legitimate supply chains. The environmental consequences are dire, with spills and pollution harming biodiversity, ecosystems and local communities. Additionally, oil theft fuels conflicts, perpetuates instability, and weakens governance structures.
Nigeria, being one of the world’s largest oil producers, faces significant challenges regarding oil theft. The country experiences substantial financial losses, environmental degradation and societal challenges as a result of this illicit activity. Nigeria’s vast oil reserves, extensive pipeline networks and complex socio-political dynamics make it particularly vulnerable to oil theft. Sadly, military officers who have the responsibility of protecting these assets have been named as a part of the thieving cartel.
One significant incident highlighting the seriousness of oil theft occurred in July in Delta State, Nigeria. Security operatives from the Joint Task Force, Operation Delta Safe, collaborated with Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited, a private security group hired by the government to help fight crude theft, to intercept a vessel carrying stolen crude oil in the Escravos area. The vessel, owned by a Nigerian registered company, was en route to Cameroon with its illicit cargo when it was seized according to the Executive Director of Operations and Technical at Tantita Security, Captain Warred Enisuoh, and the Commander of the Joint Task Force, Operation Delta Safe, Rear Admiral Olusegun Ferreira. Rather than preserving the vessel, which had been involved in illicit operations for at least 12 years, as evidence for further investigation, a controversial decision was made to set the vessel ablaze by firing rounds from a military chopper.
This action had telling consequences for aquatic life and environmental degradation. The resulting flames and thick black smoke released harmful pollutants into the air and water, further exacerbating the existing environmental damage caused by oil theft.
The decision to set the vessel on fire prevents a thorough investigation into how the theft occurred and the networks involved. Preserving the vessel would have provided valuable evidence for identifying the owners, tracing the illicit supply chain, and ultimately dismantling the criminal networks responsible for the theft. The destruction of the vessel, without a comprehensive investigation, hampers efforts to understand the modus operandi of oil theft and impedes progress in tackling the issue effectively.
Moreover, the environmental consequences of setting the vessel ablaze are severe. Aquatic life in the surrounding area is particularly vulnerable to the pollutants released into the water. The spilled oil and resulting contamination harm marine organisms, disrupt the natural habitat and pose long-term risks to biodiversity. The impact extends beyond the immediate area, affecting fishing communities and the livelihoods of those dependent on aquatic resources.
The decision to destroy the vessel highlights the complex nature of combating oil theft in Nigeria. While immediate action may be necessary to prevent further theft and secure the seized vessel, the long-term consequences of such actions must be carefully considered. Balancing the need for swift action against oil theft with the preservation of evidence, environmental protection, and the facilitation of comprehensive investigations is crucial to effectively address the problem.
Prior incidents related to oil theft in Nigeria have been accompanied by controversies, raising important questions about the actions taken and their implications. These incidents have contributed to a broader understanding of the challenges faced in combating oil theft and the need for careful consideration of the methods employed.
One such incident occurred when a vessel involved in crude oil theft was destroyed in the Niger Delta creeks. The vessel had been apprehended by Tompolo’s firm, Tantita Security Services. However, the destruction of the vessel sparked controversy and criticism from some sectors of society. Concerns were raised regarding the decision to destroy the vessel instead of preserving it as evidence for prosecution.
The controversy surrounding the destruction of the vessel led to the House of Representatives announcing its intention to investigate the circumstances surrounding the incident. The aim was to assess whether the vessel’s destruction hindered the process of bringing the perpetrators to justice. The controversy highlighted the importance of preserving evidence and ensuring a thorough investigation, even in the face of immediate actions against oil theft.
In response to the criticisms, the Federal Government defended the swift destruction of the vessel, asserting that it was carried out in accordance with the rules of engagement.
General Lucky Irabor, Chief of Defence Staff at that time, stated that the vessel was caught in the act, leading to the decision to set it on fire. According to him, no further investigation was necessary to justify this action.
The conflicting perspectives on the destruction of the vessel reflect the complexities and challenges associated with combating oil theft in Nigeria. While the immediate destruction of the vessel may serve as a deterrent and prevent further theft, it raises questions about the potential loss of valuable evidence and the ability to prosecute those involved. Striking a balance between immediate action and thorough investigation remains a critical consideration.
These controversies underscore the need for transparency, accountability and effective communication in addressing oil theft. It is crucial for relevant authorities to ensure that actions taken against oil theft are not only effective in the short term but also support long-term strategies to dismantle criminal networks, gather evidence, and prosecute offenders. Balancing the immediate need to prevent theft with the necessity of preserving evidence is essential in achieving sustainable solutions to the problem of oil theft in Nigeria.
Oil theft in Nigeria has reached alarming proportions, resulting in severe economic and environmental consequences. In April, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) discovered an illegal oil connection operating for a staggering nine years, leading to an estimated loss of approximately 600,000 barrels of oil per day. This translates to significant revenue losses for the country, amounting to billions of dollars annually. The theft of such vast quantities of oil has a direct impact on Nigeria’s economy, hindering its ability to fund essential infrastructure development, social welfare programs, and economic diversification initiatives.
The extent and impact of oil theft in Nigeria cannot be overstated. It undermines the country’s economic growth, compromises environmental sustainability, and perpetuates poverty and social instability. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach that involves stringent security measures, effective law enforcement, collaboration between government agencies and industry stakeholders, and a concerted effort to raise public awareness about the detrimental effects of oil theft on Nigeria’s present and future well-being.
However, combating oil theft in Nigeria is challenging due to the involvement of powerful perpetrators and collaborators. This illicit practice often includes influential political leaders, retired and serving military personnel, security agencies, local communities, and multinational oil companies. Their collaboration and complicity contribute to the persistence and scale of oil theft, creating a complex web of actors involved in this illegal activity.
Political leaders and ranking military officers exploit their positions of power and influence to facilitate oil theft operations. They provide protection, insider information and access to resources, allowing criminal networks to operate with impunity. Unfortunately, those who should be safeguarding national resources become key collaborators in illegal activities that drain the country’s economy.
Security agencies, entrusted with protecting oil infrastructure, often collude with criminal networks engaged in oil theft. This complicity can manifest through turning a blind eye to illegal activities, accepting bribes, or actively participating in the theft and transportation of stolen oil. The collaboration of security agencies not only undermines efforts to combat oil theft but also erodes public trust and hampers the effectiveness of law enforcement.
Local communities, living in impoverished conditions with limited economic opportunities, see getting involved in oil theft as a means of survival.
Addressing oil theft in Nigeria necessitates a comprehensive approach that includes holding perpetrators and collaborators accountable, strengthening regulations and oversight, fostering transparency and accountability within the oil sector and promoting sustainable economic opportunities for local communities. Combating oil theft requires the collaboration and commitment of all stakeholders involved, including government authorities, security agencies, communities, and oil industry players.
There is an urgency in addressing this issue, especially with a new President determined to make the tough calls required for change.
The Nigerian government has enacted several laws and regulations to combat oil bunkering and related crimes, including the Petroleum Act of 1969, the Miscellaneous Offences Act of 1983, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act of 2004, the Criminal Code Act of 2004, and the Pipeline and Product Marketing Company (PPMC) Anti-Vandalism Task Force Order of 2012. These laws aim to deter illegal oil bunkering activities, protect Nigeria’s oil assets and revenues, and impose severe penalties for offences. However, enforcing these laws faces numerous challenges such as corruption, lack of coordination among security agencies, insufficient resources, and complicity of local communities and officials.
The question, therefore, is whether President Tinubu has the political will to drastically cut crude theft. Tinubu has shown that he has the courage to make tough decisions without flinching. It is now as urgent as ever to sanitise the oil sector of the thieving cabal and all those who collude with them in this unpatriotic act. They all have to be accountable for their actions. We can only hope that it is done sooner rather than later.
About the Author
